Timothy Cahill
Publications

New Affordable Care Act Final Rule Prohibits Discriminatory Use of AI

May 8, 2024Legal Alerts

The Department for Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights (“OCR”) recently issued a final rule under Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act, which prohibits federally funded health programs from discriminating on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, age or disability. Consistent with the Supreme Court’s 2020 decision in Bostock v. Clayton County, the final rule codifies that discrimination “on the basis of sex,” under Section 1557, includes discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity. The final rule also clarified that Section 1557 protections extend to providers’ use of artificial intelligence, and more specifically the use of “patient care decision support tools,” and established an ongoing duty for providers to identify and mitigate the risks of any potentially discriminatory tools.

Under the rule, a “patient care decision support tool” is “an automated or non-automated tool, mechanism, method, technology or combination thereof used by a covered entity to support clinical decision-making in its health programs or activities.” Specific examples of patient care decision support tools include predictive algorithms that assess patient risks of severe health events, as well as tools used to provide medical necessity analyses to approve or deny medical claims. OCR clarified that in using these tools, the unique facts and circumstances of each individual patient must be considered, citing studies where reliance on certain algorithms have resulted in racial and ethnic disparities. Importantly, non-automated tools, such as flowcharts, are included in the above definition. Such tools may result in discrimination if, for instance, they screen out individuals with disabilities such that they are prohibited from accessing equitable care, or covered entities fail to consider individual factors in health assessments.  

Covered entities now have an ongoing duty to “make reasonable efforts to identity” its uses of patient care decision support tools that use input variables of race, color, origin, sex, age or disability. The entity then must mitigate the risk of discrimination that may result from any identified tools. OCR says that compliance with this requirement would be measured on a case-by-case basis, and that it would consider factors including:

  • the covered entity’s size and resources,
  • whether the tools were used as intended by the developer and approved regulators,
  • whether the covered entity received product information from the developer regarding the potential for discrimination and
  • whether the covered entity has a method in place for evaluating the tools it uses. 

The rule further changed its prior position on Medicare Part B funding, saying it considers such funds to meet the definition of “Federal financial assistance” when received by providers and suppliers. The small number of recipients that do not receive any Federal financial assistance other than Part B funds will now be required to comply with Section 1557, as well as other Federal civil rights laws enforced by OCR.

Providers should contact their Dinsmore healthcare attorney with questions on how this final rule might affect their practice.