C. James Zeszutek

Experience

Lead Counsel in Class Action Personal Injury Litigation

Denise served as lead counsel in a personal injury litigation filed on behalf of 19 coal preparation plant workers alleging personal injuries, including cancer, reproductive toxicity, genotoxicity, neurological, including peripheral neuropathy, and CNS damage.

After nearly one decade of fierce litigation, all claims were dismissed based on Summary Judgment Motions or by the court on other grounds.

Lead Counsel in Defense of Medical Monitoring Class Action Suit

Denise served as lead counsel in defense of a medical monitoring class action lawsuit filed by coal-preparation plant workers alleging exposure to polyacrylamide flocculant.

NCAA Investigation

Currently representing former University of Miami assistant football coach Aubrey Hill and former University of Miami assistant men’s basketball coaches Jake Morton and Jorge Fernandez through NCAA investigation into alleged violations of NCAA bylaws and legislation. Investigation centers around alleged violations relating to the improper benefits provided to student-athletes, as well as the recruitment of student-athletes.

NCAA Investigation

Successfully represented former University of Memphis head basketball coach John Calipari through NCAA investigation into allegations of academic fraud. Counseled Calipari through investigation and hearing before the NCAA Committee on Infractions, and he was not charged with any NCAA violations.

NCAA Investigation

Successfully represented former University of Tennessee head football coach Lane Kiffin through investigation by NCAA into claims of failure to monitor and promote an atmosphere of compliance. The NCAA Committee on Infractions eventually concluded that Kiffin did not commit major infractions and would not be penalized.

NCAA Investigation

Represented former University of Connecticut assistant men’s basketball coach Andre LaFleur and former director of basketball operations Beau Archibald during NCAA investigation into alleged violations of NCAA bylaws and legislation relating to the recruitment of student-athletes. Following the investigation, the NCAA Committee on Infractions did not issue major sanctions or a postseason ban to the program.

NCAA Investigation

Represented Syracuse University assistant men’s basketball coach Mike Hopkins, director of compliance Erlease Wagner, former athletic trainer Tim Neal and former director of compliance Jamie Mullin through NCAA investigation into alleged violations of NCAA bylaws and legislation.

NCAA Investigation

Represented former Ohio State University assistant men’s basketball coach Paul Biancardi through NCAA investigation into alleged violations of NCAA bylaws and legislation relating to the recruitment of student-athletes.

Adam v. Spotswood

We defended a husband and wife, homeowners, who had rented their home to the plaintiffs, a husband, wife, and infant child. Approximately 2 months after moving into the home the infant child was diagnosed with autoimmune pancytopenia a relatively rare but known blood disorder. Autoimmune pancytopenia is a depression of the blood cell lines, reds, whites, and neutrophils. At about the same time that the infant child was diagnosed with autoimmune pancytopenia, mold, including stachybotrys mold, was discovered in the home. The plaintiffs claimed that they were forced to abandon the home, destroy all of their personal property, and further that the mold exposure caused the infant child's autoimmune pancytopenia. The theories of recovery asserted against the defendant home owners were of negligence, breach of contract, and breach of the warranty of habitability. At trial plaintiffs proceeded solely on their negligence theory.

During pretrial discovery it became clear that the plaintiffs' expert on the contention that the alleged mold exposure caused the infant's autoimmune pancytopenia was not following generally accepted scientific/medical methodology to reach his causation opinion. On behalf of the home owners, we filed a Frye motion to exclude this expert. After extensive depositions of both the plaintiffs' expert and our expert as well as briefing and arguing the issue, the trial judge excluded the plaintiffs' expert's testimony that mold caused the infant son's autoimmune pancytopenia. At trial, plaintiffs proceeded on their property damage claim and also on the theory that their infant son's asthma was caused by the alleged mold exposure in the home.

Following three days of trial, the jury returned a verdict for less than 10% of the claimed property damage and a defense verdict on the asthma claim.

Plaintiffs filed post trial motions seeking to reverse the trial court's decision to exclude the plaintiffs' expert on autoimmune pancytopenia. The trial judge affirmed his decision. The plaintiffs then took an appeal to the Pennsylvania Superior Court. The Superior Court affirmed the trial court's decision to exclude the plaintiffs' expert's testimony that mold caused autoimmune pancytopenia.

Hatfield v. Nalco Company

Plaintiff brought suit against his employer claiming deliberate intent and against our client, Nalco Company, after falling down a flight of stairs at the coal preparation plant where he worked.  Plaintiff claimed that Nalco negligently manufactured polyacrylamide flocculant, which allegedly caused Plaintiff to fall when he stepped on the product which was on the floor of the plant.

Nalco did not believe that it was a proper defendant in the case and therefore filed a Motion for Summary Judgment.  Following the filing of the Motion, Plaintiff voluntarily dismissed Nalco from the case and no money was paid to the Plaintiff from this Defendant.

Jeran v. Nalco Company

Plaintiff brought suit for over $1 million against out client, Nalco Company.  Plaintiff was invited to a golf scramble by a Nalco representative.  During the course of the golf outing, Plaintiff consumed alcoholic beverages and at the end of the outing fell down a flight of steps, rendering him a quadriplegic.  Plaintiff sued the sponsor of the outing, the country club where the outing was held and the Nalco sales representative.

Following the sale representative's deposition, Nalco filed a Motion for Summary Judgment.  Thereafter, Plaintiff settled with Nalco for a nominal amount.